arXiv
Open repository of research manuscripts and their versions, independent since 2026; moderation is not peer review.
Screenshot captured on an unrecorded date. The current website may have changed.
Read the relevant preprint version
Record the version number and look for a subsequent journal publication.
Check first: Repository availability alone does not establish peer review.
Compare this resource with other directory records →
Recover a passage from an arXiv version
- Submission history
- Identify the version read.
- Full identifier
- Fix the citation’s version.
- Read the history and displayed version on the record.
- Keep the identifier with its version suffix.
- Check comments and any withdrawal before citing.
Fictional example: a presentation uses a result from an older version. The record now displays a revision. Lou recovers the full identifier and compares the passage; she does not assume her old screenshot still describes the default version.
Your useful record: Versioned identifier, document date and passage used.
Archiving a version does not validate its results.
Editorial method informed by arXiv Help — Version availability. Documentation consulted on . Examples are fictional exercises, not results from a live service test.
Cite the version you actually read
A version suffix distinguishes successive states of an arXiv submission.
| Element | Meaning |
|---|---|
| No suffix | The identifier resolves to the latest version. |
| v1 | First version. |
| v2, v3… | Later versions of the same submission. |
| YYMM block | In modern identifiers it encodes year and month, not the scientific category. |
| Sequence number | Four digits from April 2007 through December 2014; five since January 2015. Preserve leading zeros. |
Try the reasoning
Illustrative situation. Your notes concern v1, but the unversioned link now opens v3. What should you retain?
Read the explanation
The versioned link and the passage used. Compare versions before repeating a conclusion; a new version number alone does not tell you what changed.
Documentation for the table : arXiv — Identifier · . The exercise is an editorial example.
Separate deposit, moderation and scientific review
arXiv distributes scholarly works and their versions. It reports becoming an independent nonprofit in 2026 after being hosted by Cornell. Its moderation is not peer review: authors remain responsible for the content.
- Status
- A repository of works; check each article’s publication status.
- Version
- Keep the identifier and version number actually read.
- Review
- arXiv moderation does not validate the results.
- Reproducible address
- An address without a version suffix displays the latest version. To document a citation, retain the v1, v2 or later suffix matching the text actually consulted, together with its date.
- Reading history
- The abstract page lists available versions. If a conclusion changes, compare the relevant versions and record the journal reference separately; a version number alone does not describe editorial status.
- Unversioned arXiv URL
- An abstract page without a version suffix shows the latest version.
Source: arXiv Help — Version availability · consulted on - Versioned withdrawal
- Withdrawal creates a version explaining the reason without a content file for that version.
Source: arXiv Help — Version availability · consulted on
Has every arXiv paper been peer reviewed?
No. Check any journal reference and published version separately.
Initial profile documentation
- Séparer dépôt, modération et évaluation scientifique / Separate deposit, moderation and scientific review ↗
- arXiv — Versions et citation ↗
Initial profile documentation consulted on . Added details carry their own source and consultation date above.
Editorial selection, without website certification. Read our method.